Wpływ antropogenicznych zmian środowiska na tempo wzrostu płoci, Rutilus rutilus (L.)

Zalewski, Maciej; Penczak, Tadeusz

doi:ISSN 0013-2969

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Wpływ antropogenicznych zmian środowiska na tempo wzrostu płoci, Rutilus rutilus (L.) Zalewski, MaciejPenczak, Tadeusz

Wpływ antropogenicznych zmian środowiska na tempo wzrostu płoci, Rutilus rutilus (L.)

The effect of anthropogenous changes in the environment on the growth rate of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.) ; Wpływ zmian środowiska na tempo wzrostu płoci

Zalewski, Maciej ; Penczak, Tadeusz

Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Ekologii

Państwowe Wydawnictwa Naukowe

Warszawa

1978

Pages 367-376 ; 24 cm ; Bibliographical references (pages 375-376) ; Abstract in English

Journal/Article

water ; pollution ; aquatic pollution ; stream ecology ; common roach ; Rutilus rutilus

The growth rate of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), in three research cycles was compared on three sites on the river (Pilica) differing in the degree of water pollution and fish density.No significant differences were observed in the growth determined in independent research cycles on the same sites (Fig. 1).It has been shown that the growth rate is inversely proportional to density. In most polluted water, despite several times lower density the growth rate is lower (Fig. 3). When analysing the shape of the curve, the differentiation of the growth rate in an annual cycle, the winter “decrease” in length of adult generations, was explained by driving out weaker individuals from wintering places (old river-beds, marginal water bodies) to the extreme environment — the river in winter (Fig. 2).The growth rate of roach from the Pilica and the regularities which control it has been compared with results of other authors investigating different types of water (Fig. 3). It has been confirmed that the main factor stimulating the growth of roach is the length of the vegetation period, quality of food and population density.

Backiel T., Horoszewicz L. 1970 — Temperatura a ryby — IRŚ, Olsztyn-Żabieniec, ss. 25.
Backiel T., Le Cren E. D. 1967 — Some density relationships for fish population parametrs (W: The biological basis of freshwater fish production. Red. S. D. Gerking) — Blackwell, Oxford, 261—293.
Cragg-Hine D., Jones J. W. 1969 — The growth of dace Leuciscus leuciscus (L.), roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) and chub Squalius cephalus (L.) in Willow Brook, Northamptonshire — J. Fish Biol. 1: 59—82.
Hunt P. C., Jones J. W. 1975 — A population study of Barbus barbus L. in the River Severn, England. II. Growth — J. Fish Biol. 7: 361—376.
Kanno S. 1969 — Growth and age distribution of some fish species in the River Paimionjoki, southwestern Finland — Annls zool. fenn. 6: 87—93.
Karpińska-Waluś B. 1961 — Wzrost płoci (Rutilus rutilus L.) w jeziorach okolic Węgorzewa — Roczn. Nauk roln. 77: 329—392.
Kempe O. 1962 — The growth of the roach (Leuciscus rutilus L.) in some Swedish lakes — Inst. Fresh. Res. Dorttningholm, 44: 42—104.
Le Cren E. D. 1958 — Observations on the growth of perch (Perea fluviatilis L.) over twenty-two years with special reference to the effects of temperature and changes in population density — J. Anim. Ecol. 27: 287—334.
Lewandowska-Jarzynowa B. 1966 — Płoć (Rutilus rutilus L.) i kleń (Leuciscus cephalus L.) z Bystrzycy Lubelskiej — Roczn. Nauk roln. 89: 239—252.
Mann R. H. K. 1973 — Observations on the age, growth, reproduction and food of the roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) in two rivers in southern England — J. Fish Biol. 5: 707—736.
Mann K. H., Britton R. H., Kowalczewski A., Lack T. J. Mathews C. P., McDonald I. 1972 — Productivity and energy flow at all trophic levels in the River Thames, England (W: Productivity problems of fresh- waters. Red. Z. Kajak, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska) — PWN, Warszawa-Kraków, 570—596.
Penczak T., Zalewski M., Moliński M. 1976 — Production of pike, roach and chub in a selected fragment of Pilica River (barbel region) — Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 23: 139—153.
Penczak T., Zalewski M., Moliński M., Szpoton K. 1976 — The ecology of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), in the barbel region of the polluted Pilica River. I. Growth — Ekol. pol. 24: 437—489.
Pivnicka K. 1972 — Zmeny rustu populaci plitice v souvislosti s napustenim nektesych udolnich nadrzi — Ziv. Vyroba, 9: 669—676.
Pliszka F. 1964 — Biologia ryb — PWRiL, Warszawa, ss. 334.
Ricker W. E. 1968 — Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh- waters — Blackwell, London, ss. 313.
Skóra S. 1964 — Charakterystyka płoci (Rutilus rutilus L.) ze Zbiornika Goczałkowickiego — Acta hydrobiol. 6: 351—374.
Stangenberg M. 1950 — Udział w odłowach i wzrost niektórych gospodarczo ważniejszych ryb jeziora Charzykowo. Jezioro Charzykowo. Część I — Prace bad. Inst. bad. Leśn.: 217—244.
Stangenberg M. 1953 — Wzrost płoci — Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1: 189—217. Stangenberg M. 1965 — Coarse fish research in Poland (W: Proceedings of the Second British Coarse Fish Conference) — Dept. Zool. Univ. Liverpool, Peterborough, 72—86.
Tesch P. W. 1968 — Age and growth (W: Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Red. H. E. Ricker) — Blackwell, Oxford-Edinburgh, 93—120.
Weatherley A. H. 1972 — Growth and ecology of fish populations — Academic Press, London-New York, ss. 293.
Wilkońska H. 1975 — Zróżnicowanie tempa wzrostu płoci (Rutilus rutilus L.) w jeziorach Polski na tle warunków środowiska — Roczn. Nauk roln. 97: 8—30.
Williams W. P. 1967 — The growth and mortality of four species of fish in the River Thames at Reading — J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 695—720.
Zawisza J. 1961 — Wzrost ryb w jeziorach okolic Węgorzewa — Roczn. Nauk roln. 77: 681—748